Not known Facts About tort and contract law cases
Not known Facts About tort and contract law cases
Blog Article
The punishment prescribed under Section 302 PPC reflects the seriousness with which the Pakistani legal system views intentional murder.
The court emphasized that in cases of intentional murder, the gravity of your offense demands the most stringent punishment, thinking about the sanctity of human life and deterrence for opportunity offenders.
Capital Punishment: Section 302 PPC delivers with the death penalty given that the primary form of punishment for intentional murder. The offender might be sentenced to death as retribution for taking the life of another human being unlawfully.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
three. I have listened to the learned counsel for your parties and have long gone through the record of this case with their able assistance.
It allows individuals to research legal issues, understand their rights, and prepare for legal proceedings. This access is particularly important in Pakistan, where legal aid can be expensive and difficult to obtain.
148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Provided the legal analysis on the subject issue, we are from the view that the claim of your petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally sound, In addition to promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're topic to rules and regulations In the event the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case from the petitioners for promotion may very well be viewed as, however, we have been apparent within our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded for seniority and promotion since the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, issue to availability of vacancy issue to the approval of the competent authority. Read more
The court cannot hear the transfer order challenge because it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders maintaining in view that on the list of respondents has retired from service as pointed out via the counsel with the respondent university. 12. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order as to costs. Read more
9. Needless to mention that any observations made in the above order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.
Please note, If you're seeking a cost exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that check here court directly.
Using keywords effectively is also essential. Contemplate using synonyms and variations of your keywords to ensure you capture all relevant results. Understanding the citation system used by Pakistani courts will also help you pinpoint specific cases.
ten. Without touching the merits from the case on the issue of annual increases within the pensionary emoluments from the petitioner, in terms of policy decision in the provincial government, these types of once-a-year increase, if permissible during the case of employees of KMC, requires further assessment to become made via the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance as a consequence of funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more
In the event the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is generally only finished if the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and also the petitioner company responded for the allegations as such they were well aware of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to become looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to ascertain a commission of internationally known and acknowledged researchers to review and rule on long term grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power lines.